Science, Sexuality, Technology

Not always a smooth mix:  HERE.

Thoughts?


Comments

  1. AnonymousSeptember 11, 2017 at 7:54 PM

    I'm interested more in the reaction to this scientific study being conducted than the data itself. The study itself is harmless and done using mathematical algorithms and therefore the only bias that could exist is in the delivery of the information which seemed to have been done with no clear agenda. I can totally see how a study like this could raise ire in the LGBTQ community who have to fight off bigoted bullshit constantly I'm sure. The immediate dismissal of something like this though does not do the LGBTQ community any favors; while it seems like this study's usefulness in the progress of society is limited or non-existent, dismissal of science is not a good look for anyone. Still, the intentions of the people who decided to gather this data are definitely not clear despite what they say. Perhaps this was done to intentionally poke at a sensitive topic that affects lots of people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Assignment for Thursday, Nov. 2

So we'll re-read, with great care, 110-127. I learned from our discussion today, and I am grateful to you all for that.  There is no simple solution to these things.  (As in the example:  If I insist on "Dr. Campolo," I help prop up several forms of harmful power, and I benefit from them.  If I insist on "Chris," I help prop up several forms of harmful power, and I benefit from them.) If in some ways our "domains" are so intertwined that any move in mine shapes the possible moves in yours, and vice versa, then we may constantly be fighting for what we each think of as the domain-respect due us.  (I think that that was Anna's point.)   And if that's possible, then it may be that there is a constant anger, often submerged, but always there, and justified.    I got nothing for that.  I very strongly feel the pull of the idea that I can ultimately only reduce the pain I cause by going away.  Even such a (wholesome) separatism is an...
Read more

Assignment for Thursday, Sept., 7

First, a few more words about "false consciousness." It is sometimes used interchangeably with "brainwashed," but that's not a perfect synonym.  Brainwashing usually means something like: heavily influenced in one's thoughts, in a way that does not come from, or respond to, critical reflection, alternative views, stated reasons, etc.  False consciousness is, instead, a diagnosis which asserts that the affected persons (or class of people) have views--even of themselves and their own ideas and desires and hopes, etc., that are not "true" to their authentic selves.  They're not impervious to reason.  Their reasons are just not the ones that their authentic selves would have. What's an "authentic self"?  Who gets to say who has "false" consciousness? How would someone go from false to "true" consciousness? All very difficult--the subject of many thousands of pages. And morally tricky--asserting that so...
Read more

Assignment for Mon., Sept. 11 I mean Tuesday 9/12

So many thoughts.  I keep thinking about "exclusions," and the historical movement of some of them from "obviously necessary" to "obviously unjust." I am also thinking about false consciousness, which I did not explain well.  (But I think that there are accessible analogues.) We will talk more about these things. I'm thinking about a syllabus.  Would you believe that it has been done, all this time?  It has.  I'm just insecure about it. For Monday, 201-244 in Feminism in Our Time.   Good, close reading, so we could have a discussion as good as Thursday's. You will notice that one of the readings is by the very famous write Kate Millet.  She just died this week.  Here's a link about her that David sent me:  HERE . And here's a link I caught, as I soaked in the interwebs: HERE .  (Where are those links you were going to send me, about the variety of forms of relationships???)
Read more